Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 48,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2017, 6:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:28 am
See Kirby v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The opinion is Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
Another skirmish in the Arbitration Wars: Mayers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
Airtours further believed that they had incurred the costs of the services provided by PwC for the purposes of its business. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Costs can be upwards of $1,000 per apartment. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
[Nicholas Laboratories, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:25 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently issued a reminder of this cost in Thoroughbred Software International v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:08 pm
A little more than six years ago, in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
The Missouri case, Watts v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm
On January 29, 2010, the California Court of Appeal decided in Lhotka v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
” Computer Programming Unlimited, Inc. v Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Case No. 3:21-cv-2350 in the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 3:17 pm
Olshan Foundation Repair v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:42 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am
Peter Thiel match-up [Jacob Gershman, WSJ] “Prosecutors Investigate Firms That Offer Plaintiffs Early Cash” [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Seventh Circuit: parents, not Starbucks, bore duty of protecting 3-year-old from harm resulting from playing on crowd-control stanchions [Roh v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am
Wright/WLF, earlier] Dear SCOTUS: certification of a class action should be based on admissible evidence [Andrew Grossman, Ilya Shapiro, and Meggan DeWitt on Cato cert amicus brief in Taylor Farms v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
The plaintiff in Traybman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
BASR P’ship v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
Sys. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
The High Court decided not to make such an order, following the practice described in R (Davies) v Birmingham Deputy Coroner [2004] EWCA Civ 207 (“Davies”): that, if a court or tribunal adopts a neutral stance in proceedings in which its decision is challenged, it will not be liable for the costs of the claim, unless there are exceptional circumstances. [read post]
