Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
But that's not the New York state record. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm
As we argued in our friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
This is consistent with other judgments of the Court such as Actavis v Boehringer Ingelheim in which it was held if the circumstances of the required cross-undertaking were to change materially – for instance if the Secretary of State for Health were subsequently to seek to be made a party to the cross-undertaking – then the applicant should be given the further opportunity to reassess the situation and decide whether it wished to continue with the… [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:27 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:11 am
And unfortunately for the defense, a similar circumstance was allowed by the Florida Supreme Court as recently as this year in McWatters v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 12:55 am
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005); Kontrick v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
State of Florida, No. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm
The second day of the week-long hearing in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
Aguilar v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
As we’ve discussed, whether or not police lab experts can be cross-examined by criminal defense counsel was decided this summer in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:52 am
The plaintiff cross-moved for leave to file a second amended complaint. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:23 am
Citing the CCA case of Rankin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm
An 8-1 decision, Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:27 am
Facts: In this case (Gomez v. [read post]
