Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 9,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, what does this mean for your business? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
Plenty, as we see in Dimock v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:53 pm
The April 3, 2019 Supreme Court opinion in Stone v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
From today's press release, by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:, about Palsgaard v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
., v. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 1980 case of Stone v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
R. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
See Rosalind English’s post about the decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
See also Rosalind English’s post In the courts City of London v Samede [2012] EWHC 34 (QB). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
Although some of these points make little or no legal sense, the intention appears to be that the Convention should remain part of English law and should continue to be interpreted and applied by the English Courts. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
Valley Forge Historical Society v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am
I substituted Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
KHAN v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
In Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
(Fielding, however, proves to hold some Orientalist views about differences between English and Indian people, e.g., the latter’s greater emotionality.) [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
" Derogatory, The Practical Standard Dictionary of the English Language (1936); see also State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See State v. [read post]
