Search for: "IN RE T A G" Results 5761 - 5780 of 7,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
"The result was not close:  58% said we're not doing enough to keep traffickers off the street, while only half that number, 30%, said we have too many traffickers in prison for too long.The poll is devastating to the sentencing "reform" bills now pending in Congress. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:38 am by Ron Coleman
 You can’t disagree with Julie about this point. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:38 am by Ron Coleman
 You can’t disagree with Julie about this point. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am by Jack Goldsmith
” In a much-cited 1995 opinion by Walter Dellinger, OLC described the presidential clear statement rule as follows: “[G]eneral statutes must be read as not applying to the President if they do not expressly apply where application would arguably limit the President's constitutional role. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Par ailleurs, la juge n’a pas erré en permettant le dépôt de la déclaration signée et préparée par le père de la victime A.B. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media Research Inc… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bexis
  Again, a defendant doesn’t need such a presumption because, if the warning’s already "adequate," then the defense isn’t liable for that reason alone. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:00 pm
En 2021, en raison des contraintes qui persistent en matière de déplacement et de sécurité imposées par la pandémie COVID-19, le 10ème Forum annuel se tiendra virtuellement et avec un programme varié de sessions thématiques et régionales. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The re-naming of a residence hall at Yale University from Calhoun to Hopper was big news on 11 Feb. 2017, just one day beforeLincoln's birthday. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm by Howard Knopf
Will the imposition of explicit criteria re “competitive market” and “public interest” cause more mischief, costs and need for protracted and expensive evidence from so-called experts? [read post]