Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 5761 - 5780 of 85,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar's argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:42 am by CMS
In this post, Ingrida Jakuseva, a paralegal within the Litigation and Arbitration department at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and Anor. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:27 am by zola.support.team
In a case in Washington State with a law similar to the LAD, the case of Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'll also offer brief observations about two other aspects of the arguments, one involving the major questions doctrine and the other concerning a fairness issue that was raised by Chief Justice Roberts and then pushed by Justice Alito.StandingThe case involving the state plaintiffs was argued first. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Evelyn Tsisin
This case is one of many to come in the aftermath of the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health decision, which gave states the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not regulated by federal law. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm by Ilya Somin
Justice Neil Gorsuch noted that a majority of the Court had granted state standing in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing on behalf of the US, closed her oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:14 pm by Daniel Harawa
ShareIn many ways, Monday’s oral argument in Dubin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
The States argued that the Archivist had a duty to certify and publish the ERA because it was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the States of the Union as required by Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
“This decision has the potential to prevent colleges and universities across the State of California from providing students with the housing they need and deserve. [read post]