Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 5761 - 5780
of 41,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 11:52 am
” Nunez v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:30 am
Green v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 12:51 pm
§ 1441(b)(2). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
” Further, such an individual may be found to be disqualified for unemployment insurance benefits.Further, the decision in Blair suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b).* Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U)[Not selected for publication in the Official Reports], is posted on the Internet at: http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20NYCO%2020080929167/IN%20THE%20MATTER%20OF%20BLAIR%20v.%20HORN** For… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v City of Mount Vernon 2022 NY Slip Op 04023 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v City of Mount Vernon 2022 NY Slip Op 04023 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:37 pm
In Peacock v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:19 am
Therefore, for the reasons stated below, the Court applies the later-served rule in order to promote fairness and a uniform application of 1446(b). [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:49 am
Therefore, for the reasons stated below, the Court applies the later-served rule in order to promote fairness and a uniform application of 1446(b). [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:36 pm
In Holster v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
In AG Resources Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 8:54 pm
Tubbs v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
These matters do not include the question of justification (see section 15(1)(b)), which is a proportionality exercise. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. [read post]