Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION" Results 5761 - 5780 of 23,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Administrative Law/Telecommunications: Standard of Review; JurisdictionBell Canada v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Texas Young Lawyers Association (TYLA)
Texas Courts for Texas Veterans (see https://tyla.org/resource/texas-courts-for-texas-veterans/). [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Texas Young Lawyers Association (TYLA)
Texas Courts for Texas Veterans (see https://tyla.org/resource/texas-courts-for-texas-veterans/). [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 1:19 pm by Giles Peaker
It is unlikely to work at trial, and will cost you much more. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:12 am by Monica Williamson
They are responsible for the administration and management of the Tribal Courts. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 10:01 am by Preston Lim
The Federal Court, Canada’s national trial court that deals with legal disputes arising in the federal domain, dismissed Vavilov’s application for judicial review. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:49 am by Berry Law Firm
Court-Martial Forgiveness As for discharges accepted in exchange for the military’s promise not to try the Veteran in a court-martial, the bar only applies if the trial was a general court-martial. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This immunity is one of the necessities of the administration of justice, and courts would often be embarrassed if suitors or witnesses, while attending court, could be molested with process. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This immunity is one of the necessities of the administration of justice, and courts would often be embarrassed if suitors or witnesses, while attending court, could be molested with process. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bolton Is Willing to Testify in Trump Impeachment Trial, Raising Pressure for Witnesses MSN – Nicholas Fandos and Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 1/6/2020 John Bolton, the former White House national security adviser, said he was willing to testify at President Trump’s impeachment trial, putting new pressure on Republicans to call witnesses and raising the possibility of revelations as the Senate weighs Trump’s removal. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm by Steve Brachmann
The panel decision in that case, rendered on October 31 of last year, severed a tenure provision protecting administrative patent judges (APJs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm by Steve Brachmann
The panel decision in that case, rendered on October 31 of last year, severed a tenure provision protecting administrative patent judges (APJs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:11 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  The court in the instant matter confirmed that to the extent the trial court decision of Gilligan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:11 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  The court in the instant matter confirmed that to the extent the trial court decision of Gilligan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
In these cases, courts have split in either applying the common law “Wigmore test” or denying any special protection to confidential sources. [3] In the civil context, the public interest here would be the in the administration of justice or more particularly, providing fair disclosure to the plaintiff. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm by John Bauer
Despite the possibility that the judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) may have been unconstitutionally appointed, as held recently by a Federal Circuit panel, it is hard to imagine the Federal Circuit (or the Supreme Court) throwing out nearly a decade of USPTO policies and PTAB jurisprudence relating to administrative patent trials under the 2011 America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm by John Bauer
Despite the possibility that the judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) may have been unconstitutionally appointed, as held recently by a Federal Circuit panel, it is hard to imagine the Federal Circuit (or the Supreme Court) throwing out nearly a decade of USPTO policies and PTAB jurisprudence relating to administrative patent trials under the 2011 America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]