Search for: "United States v. California" Results 5761 - 5780 of 13,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
In the United States, the [Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)] does not contain a specific provision addressing this issue. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
United States 15-5991Issue: Whether, in the bank-fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
” At Medium, David Leopold considers what a four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:26 pm
On April 4, 2016, the California Supreme Court answered three questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding interpretation of the California wage order requirements for the provision of seating to employees (previously covered on the ILJ here). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:17 am by Matthew David Brozik
The April 13, 2016, decision from the Second Circuit in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, reliance on intermediate scrutiny to do the work of the more traditional tests is manifest in such cases as United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
On April 25 and 26, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed two Complaints in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ("SDCA"). [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State of California: Pauma Cert Petn Question presented: One of the statutory elements for establishing a prima facie case of bad faith negotiation against a state under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
Nicholas Jewell is a well-credentialed statistician at the University of California. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
” More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by MBettman
United States, 235 P.3d 42 (Cal. 2010) (The statutory phrase “keep the premises safe” is an apt description of the property-based duties underlying premises liability, a liability category that does not include vehicular negligence.) [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm by Evan Lee
United States, a case involving the California burglary statute. [read post]