Search for: "Wells v. Heard*" Results 5761 - 5780 of 9,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In addition, the present main request and auxiliary request were submitted at a very late stage of the appeal proceedings and new issues concerning clarity (A 84) could well arise due to the presence of claims for which a decision of the first instance was not given because of the appellant’s withdrawal of the request filed with the letter dated 20 March 2006. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Iin the case of Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells [2011] NSWCA 246 the Court of Appeal in New South Wales reversed the order of Levy DCJ that the trial of the action proceed without a jury. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Moreover, when the Board is indecisive even about deciding such a basic issues as whether a person engaged in case management should be on the presiding panel (which should be avoided at all costs, as is the case in the Federal Court as every experienced Federal Court lawyer knows well), it’s hard to imagine how the Board would be thinking about bringing in the concept of amicus curiae or “assessors” – which would be admittedly unusual but arguably within the realm… [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by John Jascob
The reversal of the injunction came just two days after the court heard a speedy interlocutory appeal in the case (C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:25 am by Robin E. Shea
Yes, I know this isn't a First Amendment issue, but it's still troubling to me, as well as to some prominent advocates of same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
The Constitution is alive and well, and so, too, are the rights of the accused. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:11 am
A well dressed woman approaches the podium and does the arraignment. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by Eugene Volokh
This can't possibly be consistent with the First Amendment; indeed, in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:51 am by Florian Mueller
Unfortunately, some of the people shaping Europe's patent policy are now pushing for a Stone Age approach that makes patent injunctions a given in any case in which an infringement is identified, more than eight years after the eBay v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Tuley's honest reaction might well be:  “Don't be my friend. [read post]
28 May 2025, 11:19 am
Another example of Souter’s empathy came a few years later in a search and seizure case called United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:39 pm
 That said, on the bright side, the opposition procedure itself certainly can be used for good - voices of a large number of honest opponents must be heard as well. [read post]