Search for: "White v. United States" Results 5761 - 5780 of 7,208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"AT&T was Apple's partner in the United States to provide wireless service on the iPad. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm by cdw
The Court likewise issued a stay, but subsequently lifted it, in Leroy White v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:39 pm by Russell Mace
Under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal judge may review his relevant conduct at sentencing. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Charon QC
He’s saying he didn’t want to be President of the United States so he could stay home and be “Daddy”? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
By the same token, the White Queen in Through the Looking Glass famously boasted she was able to believe "six impossible things before breakfast. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am by Kara OBrien
At one point, the Deputy Minister tells the Agent that he will “keep him in the loop” about other bids and states that the last bidder might have “certain advantages. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am by Andrew Frisch
United Emergency Animal Clinic, Inc., 390 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir.2004) (considering the applicability of § 541.304 to veterinarians); Parker v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
United States purposes), but I think that Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion is consistent with Justice Alito’s concurrence on this point, and the concurrence certainly should be seen as important to understanding that majority opinion.) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]