Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 561 - 580
of 11,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2008, 2:04 pm
The Court of Appeals rejected this argument finding that the instructions, read as a whole, accurately informed the jury that good faith was a complete defense negating the necessary specific intent to defraud the bank which the Government bore the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
" That is, in fact, the way the whole patent prosecution process works: while third parties may submit prior art and oppose grants, most of the time a patent examiner is faced with a patent attorney who will keep fighting until the patent is granted or [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Two of the independent claims on appeal read: 14. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:53 am
Continue reading [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
On January 17, ECMC filed a notice of appeal from Judge Cecilia G. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:20 am
The Board also noted that the application cannot be reopened for further examination following this appeal. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:47 am
The appeal was filed by the appellant (applicant) against the decision of the examining division to refuse the patent application in suit.II. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
Morris Anyah at the press conference that immediately followed the public reading of the appeal judgement. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:14 am
We will be watching this closely to see the outcome of this decision as this will hopefully provide some certainty on how computer simulation inventions are handled at the EPO. 1 see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition, 2016, I.A.2.4.3, under f) 2 see Part G, Chapter II, 3.3.2, of the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO (November 2018). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:02 am
The only independent claim on appeal read: 1. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The applicant filed an appeal after the Examining Division (ED) had refused his Euro-PCT application.The application as originally filed contained 28 claims. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
No one read the statement back to the witness to confirm its accuracy. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am
During the examination proceedings, the examining division referred inter alia to the following prior-art document:D5: WO 2015/11978 A1.III. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:53 pm
Continue reading [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
The Metallurgy and Material field examination division of the BRPTO issued an interesting decision on PI 0920279-0 accepting post-filing evidence during appeal stage. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:10 am
" Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog comment: I thought an examining attorney could always issue a mere descriptiveness refusal once he or she saw the specimen of use after notice of allowance. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
But thisCourt does not read MPEP § 1207.03 or 37 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Sybase filed a petition for writ of mandate with the Court of Appeal, which found that ANTs had not met the particularized showing required by Bridgestone. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:23 am
Whereas in cases decided under Section 8, a refusal to refer parties to arbitration is appealable under Section 37(1)(a), a similar refusal to refer parties to arbitration under Section 11(6) read with Sections 6(A) and 7 is not appealable. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:44 am
Further Reading: Although denials of motions for summary judgment are rarely appealable, the Arkansas Supreme Court in Parker relied on two other cases in an order denying a motion for summary judgment was held to be appealable: Danco Const. [read post]
