Search for: "AS PTO, LLC"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
PTO Br. 24. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:16 pm
Citrix Online, LLC, 792 F.3d 1339, 1348 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Sara Nasseri is an associate with Fortney & Scott, LLC, in Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:10 am
Likewise, neither the PTO nor the Requesters had presented any evidence as to the practical realities of current declaration practice to exhibit such an agency supported definition of “comments. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:28 pm
As we previously reported, on August 19, APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“APP”) filed a Motion to Intervene in the case. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:07 pm
SIPCO, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 12:20 pm
Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:49 pm
See Grand Canyon West Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:42 am
[This is my restatement of the holdings] See XY, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
GM Global Technology Operations LLC 21-2348. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
The Oregon law does not cover certain corporate directors, LLC members and LLP partners, along with sole proprietors (and the parents, spouses, and children of all of the above). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Lilly ICOS LLC et al, Civil Action No. 02-1561 (D. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has denied MDCO’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Bifurcate and Stay in Part APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC’s (“APP’s”) appeal related to Judge Claude M. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:21 pm
§ 156 to permit the PTO to accept late PTE submissions . . . for a fee ($65,000,000 for MDCO). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
See Megan La Belle, Summary of Oral Argument in Already, LLC d/b/a Yums v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:03 pm
After seeing how the article lauded the invention (and without knowing the connection), the PTO was willing to issue the patent. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
The Oregon law does not cover certain corporate directors, LLC members and LLP partners, along with sole proprietors (and the parents, spouses, and children of all of the above). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:25 pm
A description of what it means for an application to be in condition for examination is provided at MPEP § 708.02(a) (subsection VIII.C).See also:http://www.patents4software.com/2011/04/pto-issues-final-rule-to-implement-prioritized-examination-track-track-i/ [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:43 pm
The PTO rejected the notion that the patent owner's post-patent-issuance civil complaint has any bearing on the claim construction and also found that the claim scope suggested unduly broad. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Actavis Elizabeth LLC (Docket Report) US: Inclusion of Pay-for-Delay ban in Health Care Bill urged; FTC to hold press conference announcing pay-for-delay analysis (FDA Law Blog) US: Drug molecules going off patent in 2010 (Patentcircle) Products Cipramil (Citalopram) - EU: Commission opens antitrust investigation into pharmaceutical company Lundbeck (EPLAW) (Managing IP) (GenericsWeb) Hectorol (Doxercalciferol) - US: Genzyme files patent infringement complaint against Cobrek in N D… [read post]
