Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For policyholders, an important consequence of this scheme of dispute resolution is that little binding precedent has developed—or will, outside of the occasional litigation in the United States against ACE or XL that is not dismissed, develop—regarding interpretation of the Bermuda Form. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Sanofi v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am
The Canadian Supreme Court (Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34) affirmed the decision from the Supreme Court in British Columbia and ordered Google to delist a tech company’s website(s) worldwide. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
In Fischer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
This requirement makes the reader aware of the subject matter of the comment, without which justification for the defence will be lacking (Joseph v Spiller [2011] 1 AC 852). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
At the ACS Blog, Jeffrey Mandell discusses an amicus brief filed on behalf of the District of Columbia by the state of Wisconsin, joined by 23 other states, that “attempts to constitutionalize the dispute, with broad implications. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:47 pm
That settled accommodation forms such a ‘break’ was held in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, as approved by the House of Lords in R v London Borough of Brent ex parte Awua [1996] 1 AC 55. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Rost v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:29 am
On October 11, 2017, in Spiegel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Rehberg v Paulk, 566 US at 370 n 1). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2017) EWCA Civ 1624 This is an important court of appeal decision on the meaning of ‘significantly’ in Lord Neuberger’s definition of vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996 in Hotak v Southwark LBC (2015) UKSC 30, [2016] AC 811 (our report). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
Cranston J held that Al Rawi v Security Service [2011] UKSC 24, [2012] 1 AC 531 had no application to the judicial review of search warrants as the common law right to information does not arise fro consideration [39]. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am
Background Tungsten is one of three lawsuits among the equity stakeholders in a Delaware LLC known as Ace Group International (“AGI”) that owns the rights and intellectual property of the Ace hospitality brand of hotels, following the death in 2013 of its founding majority member, Alexander Calderwood. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am
Background Tungsten is one of three lawsuits among the equity stakeholders in a Delaware LLC known as Ace Group International (“AGI”) that owns the rights and intellectual property of the Ace hospitality brand of hotels, following the death in 2013 of its founding majority member, Alexander Calderwood. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:10 am
Upon a plain reading of the statute, the Court held that the MWA does not reach out of state interceptions. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:25 am
In addition, he states that ACE-V’s false positive rate it too high to justify using it in a criminal trial. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
As identified in People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At the ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia assesses Monday’s argument in Epic Systems v. [read post]
