Search for: "Agent v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 13,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
In Ingmar, the CJEU had decided that a commercial agent’s compensation claim according to Arts. 17 and 18 of the Commercial Agents Directive (86/653/EEC) could not be avoided through a choice of law in favour of the law of a non-EU country, even though the Directive said nothing about an internationally mandatory nature for the purpose of private international law – as Art. 22 (5) CSDDD in contrast now does. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
” Boozer v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States-18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:53 pm
United States, issued on August 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Negligent hiring and employment have long been found to be legitimate bases of recovery in this state. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
See, e.g., Snyder v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
See State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am
SB 264 is being challenged by an Orlando real estate firm and four Chinese citizens, with the U.S. government filing a brief in their support (Shen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:21 am
It depends on context, says the Supreme Court of Texas in Finley Resources Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am
This is particularly interesting because these Regulations have not been updated since Brexit, which means they still refer, for instance, to “the law of the other member State”. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Stegall (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm
She would be vulnerable if returned because of a lack of family support and she “would face persecution from non-state agents consequent to her religion, with no sufficient State protection being available to her”. [read post]
