Search for: "Alabama " Results 561 - 580 of 26,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Microjuris PR
La exjueza Migdalia Fraticelli Torres conversó con Microjuris sobre esta sentencia. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 2:42 am by Mary Anne Peck
AL Lawmakers Scramble to Address Supreme Court’s IVF Ruling Alabama’s House and Senate have fast tracked legislation ( HB 237 and SB 159 ) that would grant civil and criminal immunity to providers of in vitro fertilization procedures. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” The ruling upended the lives of patients undergoing IVF in Alabama and opened up a new front in the post-Dobbs battle over abortion rights. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Indeed, in most states (say, Alabama), I'm very confident that the state supreme court would literally laugh out loud at the mere mention of any such claim.So in that way, California is, I suspect, no outlier.But here's where we're different.First, there's a dissent. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:45 pm
Burke of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled via memorandum opinion that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)1 , enacted in 2021, is unconstitutional because Congress lacks the authority to require companies to disclose personal stakeholder information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the criminal enforcement arm of the US Department of the Treasury. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 11:41 am by Elina Gilbert
    Possibly, as a federal court in Alabama has recently ruled that the CTA is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:25 am by Intellectual Property Group
UPDATED 3/04/2024 On March 1, 2024, a lower Alabama federal court held that the Corporate Transparency Act, which requires certain businesses to file a BOI Report with FinCEN that includes information about their beneficial owners, is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
Evans then filed an ERISA lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:48 am by Doug Cornelius
I suppose if you are in Alabama, you could argue that it might cover you. [read post]
On March 1, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama declared the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by joanheminway
District Court judge sitting in the Northeastern Division of the Northern District of Alabama found the Corporate Transparency Act (affectionately referred to in short form as the CTA) unconstitutional as detailed in a memorandum opinion issued on Friday.... [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:20 am by Meredith Ervine
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama granted summary judgment to the NSBA in National Small Business United v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a landmark decision on March 1, 2024 in which it held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a landmark decision on March 1, 2024 in which it held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a landmark decision on March 1, 2024 in which it held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a landmark decision on March 1, 2024 in which it held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a landmark decision on March 1, 2024 in which it held that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional. [read post]