Search for: "Application of Rice" Results 561 - 580 of 842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am by Durga Rao
I have earlier written articles on the application of law of Arbitration to the Company disputes and especially the impact of the Arbitration Agreement on the jurisdiction of the Company Law Board and the Company Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants’ application for summary judgment was dismissed in December 2021 (QB-2021-001113: QB-2021-001115). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
The trial and appellate court rulings seem fairly straightforward except that the appellate court omitted serious consideration of the existence and scope of the privilege, and focused upon the applicability of the crime-fraud exception. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On the same days, Collins Rice J heard the trial in the case of LCG v OVD QB-2022-000921. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Mancari) or a presumptively unconstitutional racial classification (as recognized by SCOTUS in Rice v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
Moreover, according to the defendant's own submissions by reference to Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, it is a principle which enables the court to modify the parties' substantive rights in order to achieve what it regards as a just solution in the particular case I conclude, therefore, that the defendant cannot rely on principles of estoppel to avoid liability in this case. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
In course of this speech, Justice Sridevan addressed several important issues such as compulsory licenses, purity of trademark registries, bio-prospecting, the IPAB and equitable conduct of applicants. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 7:00 am by Jason M. Blazakis
Most of the task force’s concerns relate to Pakistan’s uneven application of travel bans and asset freezes that the U.N. 1267 Sanctions Committee has imposed on LeT members for terrorist activity. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The applicant argued that his data had been unlawfully processed. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same date Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Hewson v Times Newspapers. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
• Publication of patent applications is automatic. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 13 February 2023, there was an application in the case of Byrne v Motorsport Vision Racing Ltd and others. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by James Kachmar
Elden’s complaint, arguing that it was barred by the applicable 10-year statute of limitations for such claims. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am by MBettman
Is the doctrine of qualified privilege applicable to claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
On 20 October 2022 there was an application in the case of QRT v JBE to commit a defendant for contempt of court for breaching an interim non-disclosure order before Nicklin J,  The application was dismissed in that no reporting restriction order had, in fact, been made and in any event the application had failed to comply with CPR 81.4(2)(h) in that it did not include a summary of the facts alleged to constitute the contempt. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:06 am by Weihuan Zhou
This problem seems to be solved for now with the inclusion of specific wording for China to accept the application of US suppliers such as Mastercard, Visa and American Express and to approve an application or explain why an application is rejected in a timely manner. [read post]