Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 561 - 580 of 191,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am by Adam Wagner
Principal Reporter (Respondent) v K (Appellant) and others (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 56 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that Scottish law, which previously did not give unmarried fathers the right to  take part in a hearing relating to a child with whom they have established family ties, is incompatible with human rights law. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am by Family Law
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:41 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
This has copyright lawyers aflutter, as fair use law has been in increasing disarray for the last 20 years or so, and there is hope that finally the … Continue reading "The Stakes in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:52 pm
At the first trial the judge held that the patent in suit was valid and that it had been [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:42 am by Brian Inkster
This past week the country (UK) has been collectively transfixed, outraged and disillusioned by Mr Bates v The Post Office on ITV. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:14 pm
The order in Kentucky v. 141 Domain Names has been issued. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:07 am
Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKHL 5; [2009] WLR (D) 26 “Demonstrators who had been confined within a police cordon for several hours did not suffer a violation of their right to liberty guaranteed by art 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as scheduled to [...] [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
Regina v Tilley Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “If a third party knew of a change that affected the benefit of a person claiming income support, he would be guilty of an offence only if he dishonestly allowed the beneficiary to fail to report the change provided that he had been active in some way in the [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:23 am
Ratcliffe v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWCA Civ 39; [2009] WLR (D) 33 “A woman who had been the partner of a naval officer for over 25 years at the time of his death from disease said to derive from exposure to asbestos during his employment was in an analogous situation to that of [...] [read post]