Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court"
Results 561 - 580
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 11:29 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (“S.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:29 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (“S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Amazon.com, Inc., No. 11-1990-JLR, United States District Court, Western District of Washington at Seattle. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:30 am
So perhaps the justices are beginning to catch up to the merits nature of many justiciability doctrines (although it seems to me there is a difference between a textual commitment to a branch other than the courts for Baker v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
See, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
As a federal district court charged with applying Texas law under the Erie doctrine, the Southern District of Texas was bound to follow: (1) decisions of the Texas Supreme Court, and (2) predictions of Texas law made by the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:27 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:46 am
California District Court and instead ordered the court to rework its decision in light of Bilski v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
Its most important source is the Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
Second, the same sensitive information concerns are raised when appellate courts remand enemy combatant habeas corpus petitions to district courts; thus, the Supreme Court effectively decided in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:11 pm
U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-25539 O P I N I O N Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Kona Blue Water Farms, LLC, 2010 WL 3566731, the United States District Court in Hawaii ruled that punitive damages are available under the general maritime law claims of unseaworthiness, citing the Ninth Court of Appeals’ decision in Evich v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Nelson (U.S. 1972) and Adams v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Nelson (U.S. 1972) and Adams v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]