Search for: "Barr v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,066
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Barr, 18-776 Issue: Whether a request for equitable tolling, as it applies to statutory motions to reopen, is judicially reviewable as a “question of law. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Barr Labs., Inc., 745 F.3d 1180, 1192 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
Two seminal events have occurred in recent days in the ongoing oversight war between the House of Representatives and the Trump administration—and in the ongoing expansion of the doctrine of executive privilege. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:51 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” On the surface, Barr’s statement might even be taken as reflecting a gloss on official DOJ policy―after all, Barr’s in charge now―that a public statement about indictability is appropriate and expected, let alone permitted by the 2000 OLC Opinion.Okay, perhaps that’s a stretch. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:15 am
Barr, concerning the application of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Damus v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
” Barr moves to the lectern, and the chief justice says, “General Barr, on behalf of the court, I welcome you back as the chief legal officer of the United States and as an officer of this court. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
In Reed v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:08 am
Supreme Court today denied review in Shabo v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
