Search for: "Brake v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm by Shea Denning
Heien, 366 N.C. 271 (2012) (defendant stopped for ostensible brake light violation and arrested for drug trafficking); State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by emagraken
He cannot be faulted for opting to brake as opposed to some other manoeuvre: see Soto v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am by Jeff Welty
North Carolina, the burned-out brake light case in which the state supreme court ruled that an investigative stop may be based on an officer’s mistake of law, so long as the mistake is reasonable. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am by Jeff Welty
North Carolina, the burned-out brake light case in which the state supreme court ruled that an investigative stop may be based on an officer’s mistake of law, so long as the mistake is reasonable. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
  The relevant state statute quaintly requires vehicles to have “a stop lamp,” and no North Carolina court has ever held that the law requires two working brake lights, but the officer stopped the men because of the nonfunctioning light. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:27 am by John Day
Defendant stated that she quickly applied her brakes but was not able to avoid crashing into the rear end of plaintiff’s car. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
  Sony Wants to Put the Brakes on a “Ricky Bobby” Saloon The Hollywood Reporter. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm by Jason Epstein
In Washington state, the tread depth is legally allowed to be 2/32” at the lowest. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: 1.7 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Driver for Injury Suffered After Rear-End by 18-Wheeler Truck – Kolodzik v. [read post]