Search for: "Case v. Sullivan"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
Sullivan Court Case Number: 1:21-cv-00143-JRS-DMLFile Date: January 18, 2021Plaintiff: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin W. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In a recent case, Sullivan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:19 am
The district court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, but the Court of Appeals reverses and returns the case to the district court to reconsider the case.The case is Williamson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm
Undoubtedly, the public responded most strongly to R v Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 [Sullivan], in which the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) held that s. 33.1 of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
On 30 December 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of S (A Child) v TikTok Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:50 am
Sullivan. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:48 am
In this case, after losing the arbitration, management took the issue to court, which rules that the arbitrator did not violate the rules and that the arbitration ruling will stand.The case is A&A Maintenance v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
” See Id.; see also Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:16 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals clarifies how the Act applies in practice, issuing this ruling a full year after oral argument.The case is Tompkins v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:34 am
Case citation: Castle v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:48 am
Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 Housen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:27 am
In doing so, the Court (Sullivan, Park and Nardini) reminds us that this requires a totality-of-the-circumstances approach, drawing from cases that were decided in the last 1990s and early 2000s. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:27 am
In the first case, Ward v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
In its 2014 decision in Halliburton v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
The appellate court made clear this was a face-saving exercise; it expected Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case quickly. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
" Lowell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:20 am
A new law will require all federal judges to enter an order at the beginning of every criminal case advising prosecutors of their duties under Brady v. [read post]
