Search for: "District of Columbia v. Armes"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
The case is currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 2:52 am
Bakke affirmative action case, while on June 26, 2008, the Court ruled in the landmark District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
It addressed the merits of the defendant’s claim that Article III barred trials in the District of Columbia presided over by retired judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am
The most recent case in point: the Justices on Monday declined to review a San Francisco gun law that was remarkably similar to one they struck down in a landmark ruling in 2008 [District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
In the 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The district court denied the officials qualified immunity and the Third Circuit affirmed. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am
This ruling comes on the heels of the District of Columbia Circuit’s holding that state anti-SLAPP laws can’t be invoked in federal court. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am
Still, he went on to offer a lengthy formalistic analysis that would limit any activity by non-Article III courts to matters involving the territories (like the District of Columbia), the armed forces, or “public rights. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals excluded the evidence, because the test had not gained general acceptance among the authorities in the fields of physiology and psychology. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
District of Columbia,] 478 F.3d 370 at 400 [D.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Thus, "banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep' and use for protection of one's home and family, ' [Parker v District of Columbia,] 478 F3d [370] at 400 [DC Cir 2007], would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Indeed, federal district courts have rejected challenges to the firearms licensing schemes that were adopted in the District of Columbia and Chicago following Heller and McDonald. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
” Gold v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am
Summary of the Constitutional Arguments Relying on District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), and McDonald v City of Chicago, 130 S Ct 3020 (2010), defendant argues that PL § 265.01(1) is an unconstitutional prohibition of his right to possess a firearm in his home for the purpose of self-defense. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
I explored the question in my first published paper, Second Amendment Challenges to Student Housing Firearms Bans: The Strength of the Home Analogy.In that paper, I examine the United States Supreme Court decision, District of Columbia v. [read post]
