Search for: "Doe v. Phillips" Results 561 - 580 of 1,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 12:06 pm by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
Lord Dyson gave the leading judgment for the five-member majority, which also comprised Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Judge and Lord Kerr. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
 PK explains again: Why, then, does Cuozzo pursue this case? [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:23 am
IPKat founding father, Jeremy Phillips, is quoted vehemently criticising a UK charity clash from last year as a "a disgraceful waste of utter stupidity in branding and squandering of charitable funds for no constructive purpose", which does indeed seem to hold true for many such disputes. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
=@Phillips , 515 F.3d at 235; see alsoWilkerson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
   Indeed, in its last public trust/State title case, Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
  Extrinsic evidence is a secondary source and, as Birss J summarized Phillips v AWH Corp 415 F.3d 1303 (Feb Cir 2005), "may be less significant than the intrinsic record in determining the legally operative meaning of the claim language...Care must therefore be taken... [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:13 am by admin
 I presented with Mark Katz from Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The enforcement action implicates a number of complex topics, including: (1) when are settlement agreements pro- or anti-competitive; (2) when (if ever) can competitors agree to restrict advertising; and (3) when does competitive keyword advertising infringe trademarks? [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
And what the Federal Circuit does is not that. [read post]