Search for: "Does 1-61"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am
Consequently, the Enlarged Board assumes that the simulated systems and processes are technical and that the claimed simulations are within the scope of the referred questions.61. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:23 am
There might be an "anomaly" in treatment of S. 8 petitions and S. 11 petitions insofar as appeal is concerned but that does not mean that an amendment has to be carried out. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:41 am
Nonetheless, its role in linking case law has been that of leading, like 2., to “a reduction of liability” (at [61]-[63]). [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
’s and respondent’s B-2 visas expired on January 1, 2020. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm
Proulx, 2000 SCC 5; [2000] 1 SCR 61. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 11:24 am
After the inspector refused to make an order under s. 61(1) the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“the Act”), the union appealed to the Labour Relations Board. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 11:24 am
After the inspector refused to make an order under s. 61(1) the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“the Act”), the union appealed to the Labour Relations Board. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:55 am
However, a 28 percent federal corporate income tax rate combined with Biden’s proposal to tax long-term capital gains and qualified dividends at an ordinary income tax rate of 39.6 percent for income earned over $1 million would make the top integrated tax rate on corporate income in the U.S. the highest in the OECD at 62.7 percent (see Figure 3).[13] If the Biden tax plan were fully implemented, the U.S. rank on the Tax Foundation’s International Tax Competitiveness Index… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 12:16 pm
Congress can begin this critical racial justice work by taking the following actions: 1. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 8:50 pm
The LCR requirement is currently set out in Part Six of the CRR and Delegated Acts 2015/61 and 2018/1620. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:36 am
In an effort to avoid the prohibitive cost of hard copies, the book will be made available first as an EPub (iBook, Kindle, Amazon) (ISBN: 978-1-949943-03-0 (ebk). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:33 pm
In 2018, San Francisco voters approved, by simple majority vote, two new gross receipts taxes: the Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax (SF-HT) and the Commercial Rents Tax (SF-CRT), with both taxes effective as of January 1, 2019.[1] Because these taxes fund specific governmental services, they are designated as special taxes (specifically, the SF-HT funds homelessness services and the SF-CRT funds early childhood education). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
., 46 USPQ2d at 1460-61.Although Bunkhouse displays the phrase on its website and uses the TM symbol adjacent the proposed mark, that alone does not suffice to make it an indicator of source. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:14 pm
Holding unsound or incomplete beliefs could lead to trust in a system whose behavior does not satisfy expectations. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:07 pm
J.A. 61, 68, 71, 73. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
The per se damages rule does not apply to the latter. [read post]
