Search for: "Donald Wells"
Results 561 - 580
of 10,248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court surprised only the most optimistic of folks and reversed the Colorado Supreme Court's decision disqualifying Donald J. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
Things are not going well for those seeking to remake the nation. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:38 pm
Romney voted twice to impeach President Donald Trump, and he was a longtime loser. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
As I explained on January 28, from all that appears in the record, the controversy appeared to have become moot, given that Colorado already included Donald Trump’s name on its primary ballot, which has been sent or handed out to many voters and (presumably) returned by many of those voters to state officials. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:39 am
But, recent polls have indicated that most voters don't think President Biden (81), or Donald Trump (77) , are young enough to be President. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 2:26 pm
” via thefederalist.com Well, good. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of theFourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits for-mer President Donald J. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
The ITC cites several treatises in response, including Donald S. [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
” The argument of the Biden Administration always seemed curious to me given the claims of former President Donald Trump that Vice President Michael Pence had the authority to reject state certifications. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
However, justices may have good-faith concerns over the implications of the lower court decision as well. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am
Feb. 28, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Former President Donald Trump’s appeal of his federal prosecution for election interference. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
This paper demonstrates that the constitutional/common law of insurrection was well established and well-understood in 1866. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:54 am
Southern Command and more recently as a tough-talking Donald Trump supporter and Cuba hardliner, a persona friends and prosecutors say Rocha adopted to hide his true allegiances. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
His decision punctuates an ideological transition underway in the Republican Party, from Ronald Reagan’s brand of traditional conservatism and strong international alliances, to the fiery, often isolationist populism of Donald Trump. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
United States, in which Donald Trump has been trying to argue that he is immune from prosecution for acts taken while he was President (as Eugene noted here). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
In well-functioning democracies, courts can rely on parties to act as gatekeepers that prevent anti-democratic leaders from gaining power. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:35 pm
What Caesar giveth, he or his successor could taketh away—a very real danger, given the prospect of Donald Trump returning to the White House. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince’s legal team asserted a fair use defense, arguing that by adding the Instagram frame and interface along with likes and comments, as well as the “intentional cropping of images” and “absurdly proportioned scale,” Prince had transformed the image.[16] The main legal question boiled down to the validity of Prince’s fair use argument. [read post]
“Turning the Tables”: Many Appear to Follow the McCaskill Rule on the President’s Use of False Story
28 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
However, there is a new controversy over the President repeating a debunked claim that his leading opponent, Donald Trump, cannot remember the name of his wife. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
This is true even though Hubbard itself could have reached the result it did on narrower grounds; because civil discovery to dig up evidence to support the plaintiff in Hubbard could very well have been intrusive, the Hubbard court could have rejected the plaintiff’s retaliation claim there without shutting down retaliation claims where, as here (according to Disney), no intrusive discovery is needed to establish improper government motive. [read post]
