Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott" Results 561 - 580 of 677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  He has posts about the cases of Cripps v Vakras and Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation v Di Masi. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The law of Defamation continues to be one of the most technical areas of law, with special limitation periods, notice pre-conditions to the commencement of proceedings, special rules of pleading and evidence, and reverse onuses of proof. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
  The Prime Minister’s comments have not been well received in the legal world, with a strong dissent from Professor Sir Jeffrey Jowell QC on rule of law grounds, echoed by Dr Mark Elliott on his blog. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On reflection – and having read the complaints – I feel less convinced about the way we used these photographs, although I still feel strongly that they are an important part of this story and should have been used,” Elliott writes. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 20 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) gave judgment in the case of Rufus v Elliott ([2015] EWCA Civ 121). [read post]