Search for: "Ex Parte Virginia" Results 561 - 580 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
  Courts and the common law are part of the government, and thus equally subject to First Amendment limits, as we discussed here. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:56 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
The Court found that the ex-employee was not able to deduct his services for the company as an expense against the damages award. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:56 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
The Court found that the ex-employee was not able to deduct his services for the company as an expense against the damages award. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 7:36 pm by David Friedman
A rise in sea level of a foot or two would create problems in some parts of the world, but not problems comparable to the effect of half a mile of ice over the present locations of Chicago and London. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
A statement of fault that is part of or in addition to any of the above shall not be made inadmissible by this section. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm by lawmrh
Take, for example, that other caught-on-tape judicial outburst in July by West Virginia Judge “Chip” Watkins directed at Rev. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:54 pm
   Before we magnanimously proffer up parts of the First Amendment on the altar of security, we should imagine living in any one of the many parts of the world where the expression of dissent is met with death, a Soviet labor camp or more typically imprisonment in an asylum. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:49 am by Michael K. Allen & Associates
Part of the prosecution case is a number of allegedly inappropriate text messages sent by and to Jones. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:12 am by SHG
  While it appears that Wilson has mounted a serious constitutional challenge to his conviction, in which he vigorously asserts his innocence, we conclude that the sex offender registration requirements of Virginia and Texas are collateral consequences of his conviction that are independently imposed on him because of his status as a convicted sex offender and not as part of his sentence. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
In a 2004 decision the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued a decision called Ex parte Briseno, which basically said it is OK to execute people who are mentally retarded, so long as their retardation is “mild. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:33 am by Steve Hall
  It contains a link to the Texas Court of Criminal Appelas 2004 ruling, Ex Parte Briseno. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:58 am by Steve Hall
” Texas did this in 2004 with the criminal appellate ruling Ex parte Briseño. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am by Randy Barnett
Such a declaration of agreement on my part would not be worth much to anybody. [read post]