Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 9:29 pm
The government is prohibited from depriving life, liberty or property without due process of law, but is now doing exactly that by attacking Floyd County educators right to a fair hearing that is required under the charter agreement, Floyd County Board of Education policy, Georgia state law, and the Constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:08 pm
WOS v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Mr Justice Floyd presided over proceedings -– and he also presided over Schütz v Werit at first instance. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
The case, Floyd v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:16 pm
First, the Advocate-General's Opinion in the Amazon.com reference from the Austrian courts (see Eleonora's excellent summary here) and second, the CJEU's decision in the ITV v TV Catchup reference from Mr Justice Floyd in the English courts.Background For those not up to speed, broadcasters including ITV alleged that TV Catchup had infringed the copyright in its broadcasts by communicating those broadcasts to the public through a process of electronic transmission. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Earlier this month, Judge Scheindlin certified Ligon as a class action case and consolidated consideration of remedies in Ligon with the remedies in the broader class action suit against stop-and-frisk, Floyd v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:51 am
Arguing for respondent Floyd Perkins, Chad Readler faced this question immediately in his argument; he suggested that the district court had misapplied the standard for assessing actual innocence under Schlup v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:50 pm
Landis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
At first instance Mr Justice Floyd found the patent valid (under the headings of novelty, inventive step and sufficiency) although he construed the claim in one respect (the meaning of " a medicament for the treatment of a non-neoplastic disease or disorder characterised by undesirable excessive neovascularisation") in a manner different from that put forward by either the claimants or the defendant, stating: I see no reason to recast the definition either as… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Mr Justice Floyd allowed the proposed amendments to the '881 patent and held the patent to be valid. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:18 pm
In Holland v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
(Yeah, Gamso, you've made this point before, too.)In Kansas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Floyd, 2012 WL 2500900, (Tenn. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Paul Alston of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:31 pm
Just consider the shellacking the OSG took in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
His next book, Nuanced Absolutism: Floyd Abrams and the First Amendment, comes out this January. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
See State Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
