Search for: "G MOORE"
Results 561 - 580
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Over the past couple of decades, we’ve witnessed enormous progress on LGBTQ+ issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Moore Decl. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in May 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
The riotous insurrection at the Washington Capitol building on January 6th is a good example of this truth: “The strength of a nation’s rights, freedoms and rule of law lies not in its Constitution but in its politics. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:45 am
G. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in May 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
CAPITAL CASEEXECUTION DATEIN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESJAMES CALLAHAN,Petitioner,RICHARD ALLEN, et al. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:41 pm
View the article hereMeth labs, so why do they not splash the offenders photos, names, addresses and everything else on this site? [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------G&O Personnel NewsFred Goldsmith Moderates Seminar on Evolving Federal Court Pleading StandardsOn April 21, 2010, Fred Goldsmith moderated a continuing legal education seminar entitled, "Drafting and Challenging Federal Court Complaints: Three Federal Judges and a Law School Professor Outline Pleading and Motion to Dismiss Practice Post Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:03 pm
So, for example, if you were a Moor or you were a Jew in a place, like the Spanish Kingdoms or Muslim Spain, that would be another layer, because each religion would include a set of governance norms over what modern states would consider within their jurisdiction--marriage, wills and the like. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
In a recent Foreign Affairs essay co-authored with MIT economist Simon Johnson, I argued that it was essential for the G-7 and allied states to deploy a far-reaching strategy of Ukrainian reconstruction, tied to the ongoing process of EU accession for Ukraine, and funded in part by frozen Russian state and state-related assets. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The SCC (by a 7-2 majority) dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the injunction.According to taste and point of view the decision is:(a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant(b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states(c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications(d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings(e) a… [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The SCC (by a 7-2 majority) dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the injunction.According to taste and point of view the decision is:(a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant(b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states(c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications(d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings(e) a… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
Ct. 2076, 2091 (2015); Dames & Moore v. [read post]
