Search for: "Gills v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 9:13 am
More of the same can be expected if the appeals courts uphold the recent federal district court decision in Gill v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Bray v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Watson, who represented former Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini, ex First Minister Alex Salmond, ex Glasgow City Council leader Stephen Purcell, bosses at Rangers Football Club, among others, was suspended from his judicial role as a Sheriff in February of this year by Scotland’s Lord President – Lord Brian Gill. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Gill, K. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 8:51 am
Already under review is the Wisconsin case, Gill v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:11 am
On the other hand, he said, the Prop 8 opinion is narrow in that it's limited to a state that granted a right and then rescinded it whereas the DOMA case, Gill v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:48 am
” Although courts typically show a certain measure of deference to employers in how they interpret their plans, a recent Second Circuit decision (Gill v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:40 am
Photo Credit – Gilles Lambert We all know that social media, electronic communications and the online world has changed how we interact socially. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:07 pm
In a decision last month from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
Gilles Caron by G. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 12:58 am
Timothy Roes, Strasbourg Observers: Missaoui and Akhandaf v Belgium: Cold Shower for Belgian Applications: on the recent ECtHR case in which a claim by two Belgium Muslim women against a ban on burkinis in Antwerp was deemed inadmissible. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Hudson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
Investigative website Open Democracy uncovered details of the Cabinet Office during months of research for a report on the state of Freedom of Information. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:34 am
The Wisconsin case (Gill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
(Adams, v. 10, p. 179.) [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
Other guests include the judge Peter Rook, Desmond Browne QC and Gill Phillips, the Guardian’s director of editorial legal services. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am
Edward, Reconsidering the Legacy of New York Times V. [read post]
