Search for: "Good Inc" Results 561 - 580 of 28,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2019, 9:37 am by Nikki Siesel
This likelihood of confusion factor, the number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods, has been growing in importance since the decision in Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:36 am by Laura Anil (laura.anil@olswang.com)
Under article 7 of the TMD a trade mark owner’s rights pursuant to article 5 are exhausted if the goods were first marketed in the European Economic Area by the trade mark owner himself, or by a third party with his consent. [read post]
18 May 2009, 4:00 am
Yang and Microsoft Corp. v. 9038-3746 Quebec Inc., evidences a recent trend toward substantial damage awards in counterfeit goods cases. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:23 am by tortsprof
Amazon.com, Inc., the Third Circuit held that Amazon was a "seller" for purposes of Pennsylvania state law when it sold items on its website through Amazon Marketplace. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:18 am
Unlike cases in other states, Long's unemployment period had extended for over four months, advising against a finding of "good cause" that might otherwise be found had the unemployment been brief. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Apple, Inc. - Christy Susman, Letter to Patrick Wensink, Jack Daniel's, July 12, 2012 [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” BellSouth, 60 F.3d at 1569; see also Damn I’m Good, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:46 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
GEICO Insurance Agency, Inc., June 16, 2017, Rhode Island Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Injury Attorneys Must Often Fight for Underinsured Motorist Benefits, June 9, 2017, Car Accident Attorney Blog The post Court Rules ‘Good Samaritan’ Can Receive UIM Auto Insurer Benefits appeared first on Florida Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Columbus, Ohio – Plaintiff Coulter Ventures, LLC, d/b/a Rogue Fitness (“Rogue”) filed suit against Bells of Steel USA Inc., for alleged patent infringement of its fitness products in Bell’s sporting goods stores, including their Indianapolis, Indiana, Bells of Steel USA Showroom. [read post]