Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:10 am
" World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm
Lippmann is cited:Unlike in the classic case of Egbert v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Lady Hale, the only female Justice, has certainly been vocal of late. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
From Monday 23 until Tuesday 24 July 2012 is the appeal of The Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various claimants & Ors, to be heard by L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, and L Carnwath. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath give a short joint judgment concurring with the majority in relation to the Secretary of State’s appeal but dissenting on the cross appeal. [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) David Leroy Hale v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am
Comment At the close of proceedings, Lady Hale reassured everyone that the justices “don’t underestimate the importance of the issues” in the instant appeals. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Lord Dyson gave the leading judgment for the five-member majority, which also comprised Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Judge and Lord Kerr. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
The case involved is Wegelin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:07 pm
On May 3, 2013, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion awarding appellate attorney's fees and costs against the City & County of Honolulu in the amount of $41,192.00 in attorney's fees and $343.00 in costs in Kaleikini v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm
The same law firms (Irell & Manella for Fortress/VLSI, and Wilmer Hale for Intel and, in California, also for Apple) are working on the infringement cases as well as the antitrust action.Here's the complete verdict form:21-03-02 VLSI v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:36 am
Brenda Hogget (Hale) of Manchester University! [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
Lady Hale set out the terms of the reference to the court and stated in the view of the court, the principled solution to the case would be to treat the care component of DLA as an invalidity benefit for the purpose of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Both of these authorities were cited with apparent approval in Baroness Hale’s leading judgment in the Supreme Court: see paragraphs 20 and 30. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The reason that Parliament was wrong was set out in the case of MacDonald v Fernandez where no less a personage than Hale LJ (as she then was) held that an s21 notice was not a notice to quit and hence that the s21 regime fell outside the common law notice to quit regime. [read post]
