Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 561 - 580 of 1,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
That all ended on September 22, 2015, when a California U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Progressive, Bill Blum argues that a loss for California in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Discussing the opinion at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills argues that the Court’s “textualism was patently pretextual. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
Various appellate courts around the country—though none in California, to our knowledge—have held that a ‘lawyer-litigant’ has a right to appear pro se and should not be disqualified from doing so under the advocate-witness rule.'” “Hill noted that when Nelson represented himself, he did so as a ‘lawyer-litigant.'” “Rejecting the contention that Nelson waived a disqualification motion by waiting 21 months before… [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The wire instructions were to a JP Morgan Chase Bank account in Beverly Hills, California, and the account holder was designated as Wealth Assurance Private Client with an address in Santa Monica, California. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:39 pm
Responding in part to the Supreme Court's contribution to this mess with its ruling in Hill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Here in California, the question may be more difficult in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Silver Hills Country Club v. [read post]