Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY." Results 561 - 580 of 1,004
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 5:07 am by Samuel Goldberg
However, onto the list his name goes unless and until he is either found not guilty by a jury where there is a finding of no probable cause Buy a grand jury. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Montgomery Ward & Co., requires that the person arrested must, without unnecessary delay, be taken before a magistrate or delivered to a peace officer, and failure to do so will result in liability under the doctrine of trespass ab initio discussed below. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
Moreover, “indictment” has been read as covering not just indictments by grand juries, but also “informations” filed by police officers. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Specifically, he argues that, as a matter of law, the Commonwealth failed to prove that the value of the item stolen was $200 or more, and therefore, his conviction of grand larceny should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. . . .Williams v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
The proceeding begins with the issuance of a charging document, a Notice to Appear (formerly called an Order to Show Cause), an appearance in Immigration Court before an Immigration Judge. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:38 am by Ken White
Some have argued that the Department of Justice must have had information spurring them to use the grand jury to pierce the anonymity of people engaged in protected political speech. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  In addition, unlike grand jury investigations, Congressional investigations do not remain secret for extended periods. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
A grand jury may compel the production of documents and may compel the sworn testimony of witnesses to appear before it. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm by Steve Vladeck
Put another way, when the Supreme Court has articulated limits on military jurisdiction, it has done so largely by reference to the jury-trial rights of military defendants--treating the right to a jury trial (and a grand jury indictment) as interchangeable with the right to have an Article III judge preside over federal criminal prosecutions. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
   The Harris County DA's office also improperly instructed prosecutors to redact offense report information "obtained by a grand jury subpoena," disingenuously conflating confidentiality of grand jury proceedings with the information presented to them to create a new category of information excluded from the defense that's not contemplated in the statute. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:17 am by Wells Bennett
” The panel acknowledged that grand jury subpoenas—which also employ the “relevance” standard, and which serve as a model for Section 215—may allow the government to obtain large amounts of information in order to find relevant data contained therein. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”In Proceeding No. 2 pursuant to CPLR Article 78 Mossman sought a court order directing the County “to provide such a legal defense in connection with a subsequent grand jury proceeding. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm by Carrie Cordero
“Introduce Adversarial Process” The Brennan Center report supports proposals that have gained attention since the Snowden disclosures to introduce adversarial process to FISC proceedings. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Nassau Abuse and Neglect Lawyer said that, defendant next argues that the grand jury proceeding was defective because the prosecutor failed to present evidence of the police informant’s prior convictions to the grand jury. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by INFORRM
If . . . the tweets did not, as a matter of law, constitute `true threats,’ the information is fatally deficient for failure to allege an essential element of a crime under § 574.115 — `communicates a&n [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, it must be noted that Criminal Procedure Law § 190.25(4) provides: "Grand jury proceedings are secret, and no grand juror or other person specified in subdivision three 2 may, except in the lawful discharge of his duties or upon written order of the court, disclose the nature or substance of any grand jury testimony, or any decision, result or other matter attending a grand jury proceeding. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the issues in this appeal by noting that, because the judge dismissed the case before a trial had started, “jeopardy” under the 5th Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy had not attached, so the judge’s ruling was appealable. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Against Christ Anglican Church in Mobile, Alabama (plaintiff was the Diocese of the Central Gulf Coast---the suit settled in 2001 before trial, and Anglican congregation moved out; they built a brand-new church in 2005, while the historic Episcopal site became the cathedral of the Diocese that same year)2.-4. [read post]