Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:"
Results 561 - 580
of 62,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
While the bill’s authors may have had in mind those who first arrive in the United States on parole, however, the language of the bill is broad enough to cover those who use advance parole to leave and re-enter the United States while they have a pending application for an immigration benefit, most commonly an application for adjustment of status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident (green card holder). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
McCarthy’s has a good primer on the Court of Appeal decision, if you’re interested.🏳️⚧️ Alberta is applying to intervene in the pronoun litigation headed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
They’re also required to set out intermediate emissions reduction targets and pathways. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SCOTUS explained in Sec'y of State of Md. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
” In re Lowry, 138 N.Y.S.3d at 241-2. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
” (See Ray v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that the existing statute -- Section 8003 -- only bars candidates from running for multiple offices in the same election if they're running as independents, not if they're running (as here) in a primary election. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Re-assessing the EDPB’s Supplementary Measures and the Practices of European DPAs Under the Prism of a Risk-Based Approach6. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:40 pm
If you're interested in the intersection of corporate law, trademark, accounting for profits, and federal equity jurisdiction, you'll be interested in a new amicus brief that my colleague Paul Miller and I just filed in support of a cert petition in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Sumitomo Pharma Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
Connell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
The Delaware Supreme Court, in In re Match Group Deriv. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
The Delaware Supreme Court, in In re Match Group Deriv. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:23 am
Trust UDT v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
