Search for: "In Re Ades" Results 561 - 580 of 44,259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Ariad, 598 F.3d at 1351(second alternation in original) (emphasis added) (internalquotation marks omitted); Daniels, 144 F.3d at 1456(“The [written description] inquiry is simply to determinewhether the inventor had possession at the earlier date ofwhat was claimed at the later date. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:53 am by Larry
If it decides the case with no new factual record, then the value of Stone & Downer is significantly undercut and customs litigants will lose some of the safety net the option to re-litigate has provided.There is certainly more to follow on this case. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
  The reasoning in Estate of Young was approved by the Court of Appeal in Hadley Estate (Re), 2017 BCCA 311, aff’g 2016 BCSC 765. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:22 pm by Tom Smith
“I’m thankful that they’re here,” she added of the presidential visit, but of the three hours scheduled, added: “That doesn’t seem like much. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:36 pm
The oldest buildings will require certification by June 30, 2011, and re-inspection is required every 5 years after the initial report. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:30 am by Unknown
In the aftermath of the late-2000s financial crisis, the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act added Section 27B to the Securities Act. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.htmlReading Indian law: Evaluating thirty years of Indian law scholarship.Rent-A-Tribe: Using tribal immunity to shield patents from administrative review.State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMatter of Contested Case Hearing Re Conservation District Use Application HA-3568 (Native Hawaiian Traditional and… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
An added bonus is they feel like nightgowns, but look much better. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Manifestly, the CAFC decision in In re Lovin is about Rule 41.37 :In sum, we hold that the Board reasonably interpreted Rule 41.37 to require more substantive arguments in an appeal brief than a mere recitation of the claim elements and a naked assertion that the corresponding elements were not found in the prior art. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We’re not looking to alienate the White House,” Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:47 pm by Bill Otis
A:  When, in an article in Politico, the other side is quoted giving an answer like this (emphasis added):[W]hile the [percentage of those who re-offend after early release is] small - and a recent study shows they re-offend at the same rate as those who served their full terms, about 45 percent -- it only takes one example for a 30-second campaign ad. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm by Chris Williams
The post Watch Where You’re Pointing That Thing! [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:27 pm
Where an independent claim had been found invalid, a dependent claim which added the step of "informing the patient that administration of metaxalone with food results in an increase in Cmax and AUC(last) of metaxalone compared to administration without food" was unpatentable under In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]