Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 561 - 580
of 900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
After the pediatrician (who was a defendant in a separate medical review panel proceeding) testified that he would not have changed the prescription, the pharmacy moved for summary judgment on the issue of cause-in-fact. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
In October a different panel of judges of the same court -- the Munich I Regional Court -- also held a trial over two other Nokia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:11 am
Verdugo sought administrative review, but the Workers' Compensation Board Panel upheld the ALJ's ruling.In the meantime, Verdugo had sued the building owner, Seven Thirty One Limited Partnership, in 2004.Following the board's ruling in the work comp case Seven Thirty One argued that Verdugo could not recover any lost earnings or medical expenses after Jan. 24, 2006 in his personal injury action against it.New York County Supreme Court Justice Carol R. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:36 am
I was a member of a recent National Academy of Science Panel on diverging trends in longevity. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:20 am
“But I’m not sure we’re just going to wait and see. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Let’s review. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:01 am
#privacy #FTCpriv http://1.usa.gov/Hg1IYo FTC @FTC23 Oct Copy of Commissioner @JulieBrillFTC’s @nyupoly #cyberlecture speech: http://go.usa.gov/W3gj #ReclaimYourName #bigdata Matthieu Wiedenhoff @matth_w23 Oct Analyse du texte #EUDataP adopté en Commission #LIBE, première partie http://ow.ly/q67Yu [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:05 am
Jude Medical v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:48 am
Let's review ...QMEs were devised in response to one of the "other" reforms back in the 1990s. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:48 am
Let's review ...QMEs were devised in response to one of the "other" reforms back in the 1990s. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
”); In re W.R. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Hannington 13-92Issue: Whether there can be an exception to the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard of review not previously recognized by this Court when an ERISA plan fiduciary interprets plan terms which refer to outside materials. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 12:25 pm
But, Lewis told today’s panel, Judge Lamberth was simply mistaken on that point, as affidavits from Lewis and company were never before the D.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Her essays have appeared in numerous literary anthologies, including The Best American Nonrequired Reading and The Best Creative Nonfiction, as well as literary journals such as the Seneca Review and The Believer. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
Cases involving Class III medical devices and fraud on the FDA claims were also inapposite; there was no “comparably rigorous review” or premarket approval for foods here, and the extensive regulation of Class III medical devices gave preemption a different context than the FDA’s “substantial, but more limited oversight of food labeling requirements” that explicitly recognized a state role. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:33 am
“That’s what we’re going to do with the IMR here, as well. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
In re Estate of Shipman, No. 26512, 2013 S.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:14 am
July 3, 2013) (en banc) Panel opinion discussed here. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
We’re excited to have her on board. [read post]
