Search for: "In re: Apple, Inc."
Results 561 - 580
of 1,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 12:54 am
In June the US Supreme Court denied Google's writ of certiorari to re-examine the 2014 decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in favor of Oracle which held that application programming interfaces (APIs) in Java were subject to copyright protection. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Yes, said the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Multi Time Machine, Inc., v Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Services, LLC (No.2:11-cv-09076-DDP-MAN, here) when it reversed the District Court’s summary judgment order in Amazon’s favour. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Unfortunately, it also included the latter organisation’s trade mark.* Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicityViacom subsidiary TV Land has just decided to pull the plug on a current re-run on US screens following the tragic Charleston church massacre. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
In a class action by former technical employees against major technology companies for allegedly engaging in a conspiracy to fix and suppress employee compensation, the plaintiffs and remaining defendants, Apple Inc., Google, Adobe Systems, and Intel Corporation are seeking final approval of $415 million agreement to settle all individual and class claims, according to a motion for final approval of class action settlement filed in the federal district court in San Jose, California… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
The Board cited In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1471 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Court of Appeal in 'Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Apple Inc., 2014 BCSC 1821 Albayate v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:18 pm
The Board cited In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1471 (Fed. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
” Don’t want to use legal bypasses to represent them as something they’re not. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
Eric Harris, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Google, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-04080-BLF, April 1, 2015 (“Svenson”). [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
The Project, the Litigation And Key Issues The Project at issue was a use permit issued by the County of Santa Clara (“County”) allowing Candice Clark Wozniak, a former wife of Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and trustee of the Candice Clark Wozniak Trust (the “Trust”), to host a limited number of weddings and other events (28 per year for 100 guests) on a 14.46-acre tract of land in the Santa Cruz Mountains (the “Property”). [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market is to be re-branded as the "European Union Intellectual Property Office" [for real, see Katpost here!]. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
So we’re changing the name,” said Jobs. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
The validity of the patent was sustained in a director-ordered re-exam. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
The previous week's Katposts lined up like this:* It's not over till the Pink Lady sues: crunch time for apple appeal and applicationJeremy reports on Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
