Search for: "In re A. M. (1989)"
Results 561 - 580
of 951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
Afirma ofensa ao art. 96, II, c da CF, por versarem sobre matéria de iniciativa do Tribunal de Justiça. g) § 5º do art. 11 e art. 12 do ADCT da Constituição do Ceará, que asseguram efetivação no cargo para os substitutos de serventias extrajudiciais e judiciais que contem com cinco anos de exercício na data da promulgação da Constituição, bem como consideram estáveis os servidores das serventias… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:03 pm
PGR: pela ausência de pertinência entre os interesses representados pela requerente e os efeitos das normas impugnadas, no mérito, pela procedência dos pedidos. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
I’m not sure whether you still commit a crime, if, after you start working there (the application process is long over with) you decide to videotape the cruelly, but one thing is certain; if you’re stupid enough to admit you made the decision before working there your probably committing a criminal act. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Despite having case law cited to it (such as In re Ephedra), the trial court looked to the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, a resource that seems to be ignored by many federal judges, and rejected the bogus argument. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
The blaze was confined to the room MacDonald died in and the fingers of both his hands had been hacked off.MacDonald's mother, Eileen has called on Thai police to re-open the inquiry into her son’s death. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
” In re Ephedra Prods. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
If the decision is quashed, the decision maker may be free to re-consider it and as long as the error of law is not repeated and no other error committed, may reach the same decision. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:45 pm
The Copyright Act hasn’t required published works to bear a copyright notice since March 1, 1989, but, hey. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
That you’re going to make mistakes. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:27 am
GOP House Minority Whip from 1989 to 1995. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
This year, I’m taking a look at the history of Super Bowl logos. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
That principle was first set out in Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 113, Series A no. 161 and has been subsequently confirmed by the Court in a number of cases (see, inter alia, Mamatkulov and Askarov, cited above, §§ 90 and 91; Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, § 149, ECHR 2010-…). 259. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
So I’m going to call him Mr Pseudonym. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
Time Inc., 1989 WL 79880 at *30 (Del. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
CarrieLyn Donigan Guymon (left), an IntLawGrrls contributor who, we're delighted to announce, has accepted the position of editor, beginning with the 2011 Digest. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
In other words, I’m not objective, but I am informed. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
" This is a good reminder that when we're called for potential expert gigs, we have to clarify exactly what we're being asked to opine upon and whether it's appropriate for expert testimony. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
In 1989, Fancaster’s president and director, Craig Krueger, received a registration for Fancaster (design mark) for "broadcasting services. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
Initio Partners, 562 A.2d 1162 (Del. 1989). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Res. [read post]
