Search for: "In re C. B"
Results 561 - 580
of 11,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
We assume that, if people say, “I think they make it b/c of that word,” there’s secondary meaning and move on. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Patents 5352605, 5164316, 5196525, and 5322938, all of which assert claims to the CaMV 35S promoter, double 35S enhancer, and/or constructs containing them: 5,164,316 describes a plant cell comprising a DNA construct having as components, (a) a duplicated CaMV 35s enhancer sequence comprising an AluI-EcoRV fragment of a CaMV 35S upstream region; and (ii) a promoter comprising an RNA polymerase binding site and an mRNA initiation site; (b) a nucleotide sequence of interest for transcription… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:04 pm
“The girls could be graded like A, B and C. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 8:51 am
” All of this is obvious no-no behavior if you’re seeking to conduct a private placement under Rule 506(b). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
re not saying we'd do so hot ourselves. ... [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Extradition of Harusha, 2008 WL 1701428 (E.D. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
[Lots of notices b/c lots of internet!] [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:41 am
CODE § 7–9A–604(c). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
”) In re Adoption of Sunderhaus, 63 Ohio St.3d 127 (1992) (R.C. 3107.07(A) requires one year of “nonsupport. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:49 am
Section 2.2(B)(5)(f)(3) governs the testimony and qualifications of expert witnesses. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:50 am
Giovanni B. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm
§ 1391(c) furnished adefinition of “resides” that applied to § 1400(b). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Some defense counsel are concerned about not being able to file a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) after you have answered, but the same relief should be available on a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:19 am
This might very well enable one skilled in the art to make and use compounds B and C; yet the class consisting of A, B, and C has not been described. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:28 pm
Are there plans to add "three strikes and you're out" Internet termination rules to Bill C-11? [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
Maybe b/c it makes market work better—allocative efficiency. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:27 pm
8.7 hours; down (13%) c. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:58 pm
In re Charles Tanner Phillips, II, a Louisiana attorney accepted and kept attorney’s fees from multiple clients, but did not perform any substantive legal work in return. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:58 pm
In re Charles Tanner Phillips, II, a Louisiana attorney accepted and kept attorney’s fees from multiple clients, but did not perform any substantive legal work in return. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:12 am
In re Billy Frederick Allen (Tex. [read post]
