Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 561 - 580
of 13,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 2:23 am
I'm in the process of expanding this research into a longer, footnoted paper, but for now here are some excerpts on the subject:The biggest single reason for jail overcrowding: Put simply, more Texans are incarcerated pending trial, i.e., before they're convicted, than at any time in history. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
” Accordingly, an argument can be made that to find a violation of antitrust law, the court must be persuaded that a payment (i.e., monetary transfer) was made.2. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
The reasoning applied in those cases is that "the mark was used to provide a computer user with direct access (i.e. a link) to defendant's website. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:50 am
Most liberals seem to believe that it is sufficient to address what the Amendment (might have) meant in 1791, and they usually offer a quite limited meaning, i.e., the "state militia" account. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:04 am
So if you’re entering into form contracts with consumers, don’t hamper their ability to review your products, services or conduct – and if you’re unhappy about this, well, you could always write a negative review about the CRFA. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:08 pm
"You're right, they don't. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Many steps can be commoditized (i.e. step by step instructions) and an over-emphasis on legal concepts can interfere with the person’s deployment of the information. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:10 am
On the same day, the omitted act, i.e. the filing of the statement of grounds of appeal, was completed and the fee for re-establishment was paid. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:06 pm
In the wake of Exxon, Third Circuit courts have been quick to re-affirm their adherence to the Rooker-Feldman paradigm, while simply invoking the doctrine of Res judicata, or claim preclusion, whenever the Exxon limitation may be implicated. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:59 pm
This is a great way to end the month.Chief Judge Kozinski writes a dissent from the denial of a petition for rehearing en banc (i.e., for him, a "dissental") that's classic Alex. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
Sometimes you win in the Court of Appeal and you're really, really happy. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:11 am
The CAFC explained that a claim may be broadened with respect to previously surrendered subject matter (i.e., recapture) if the claim is also materially narrowed with respect to the surrendered subject matter. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
Or at least not what it says now.The law is instead that you're allowed to enter the intersection -- even if it says "DON'T WALK" -- as long as (1) the red sign (or the red hand) is still flashing, rather than constantly red, and (2) you finish your walk -- i.e., are out of the intersection -- before the countdown expires.That's what I always thought the rule was. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 6:25 am
"Also, anticipating one of the main lines of attack from the Deaccession Police (i.e., however legitimate the need, the money should be raised by other means), the story includes the following from a Met curator: "We’re facing a huge budget deficit. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:30 pm
"Writes Matt Taibbi, in "Tracking Orwellian Change: New Meanings of 'Deep State' and 'Working Class'/When left/liberal fixations fall out of establishment favor, they're re-christened as conservative menaces" (Substack). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 1:06 pm
You're looking for state and federal primary law (i.e. codes, regulatory authority). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:13 pm
You failed to provide attribution, so you're not entitled to the license, i.e. you are infringing, The company can sue you and $750 is the minimum amount of statutory damages that a judge can award for copyright infringement. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
The fact that claim 28 could bemade to read upon a device with a zero or close to zero channel length, i.e. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:00 am
However, if you are not disabled, you're not covered under the ADA. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
Without a warrant or “exigent circumstances” (i.e., urgent circumstances) you are not required to open your door to the police. [read post]
