Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 561 - 580
of 13,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 2:23 am
I'm in the process of expanding this research into a longer, footnoted paper, but for now here are some excerpts on the subject:The biggest single reason for jail overcrowding: Put simply, more Texans are incarcerated pending trial, i.e., before they're convicted, than at any time in history. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
" See In re Pitney Bowes, Inc., 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1417, 1420 (T.T.A.B. 2018); In re DSM Pharms., Inc., 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1623, 1626 (T.T.A.B. 2008). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
E.g., In re Sullivan,498 F.3d 1345, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
Sometimes you win in the Court of Appeal and you're really, really happy. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:11 am
The CAFC explained that a claim may be broadened with respect to previously surrendered subject matter (i.e., recapture) if the claim is also materially narrowed with respect to the surrendered subject matter. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:08 pm
"You're right, they don't. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:04 am
So if you’re entering into form contracts with consumers, don’t hamper their ability to review your products, services or conduct – and if you’re unhappy about this, well, you could always write a negative review about the CRFA. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:18 pm
I normally like and respect Andrew Sullivan and Henry Farrell, but they're way over the deep end right now: Are Right-Wing Blogs More Dangerous Than The Left? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:08 pm
So we're on to Part 2 on this topic. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:59 pm
This is a great way to end the month.Chief Judge Kozinski writes a dissent from the denial of a petition for rehearing en banc (i.e., for him, a "dissental") that's classic Alex. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:10 am
On the same day, the omitted act, i.e. the filing of the statement of grounds of appeal, was completed and the fee for re-establishment was paid. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:40 pm
In re SP Controls, Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:44 pm
I had often used the old website to find a range of information on bills and parliamentary inquiries (i.e., investigations into particular issues). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:58 pm
During those two years, you must re-establish good credit and demonstrate an ability to manage your financial affairs. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:03 am
Re that New York Times notice regretting its “mischaracterization” of “the Christian holiday of Easter”, Michael Walsh is right to point out that the “correction” is equally idiotic. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:22 pm
As you'll recall, the Staff indicated in that SLB that it will evaluate whether a proposal is excludable under 14a-8(i)(7) by focusing on the type of risk that the proposal seeks to address (i.e., climate change risk is not excludable but proposals relating to ordinary business risk are). [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 6:25 am
"Also, anticipating one of the main lines of attack from the Deaccession Police (i.e., however legitimate the need, the money should be raised by other means), the story includes the following from a Met curator: "We’re facing a huge budget deficit. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:25 pm
You took the car, and did exactly what you needed to (i.e., rolled the thing along) to take it, and no more. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:30 pm
"Writes Matt Taibbi, in "Tracking Orwellian Change: New Meanings of 'Deep State' and 'Working Class'/When left/liberal fixations fall out of establishment favor, they're re-christened as conservative menaces" (Substack). [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
Or at least not what it says now.The law is instead that you're allowed to enter the intersection -- even if it says "DON'T WALK" -- as long as (1) the red sign (or the red hand) is still flashing, rather than constantly red, and (2) you finish your walk -- i.e., are out of the intersection -- before the countdown expires.That's what I always thought the rule was. [read post]
