Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 561 - 580 of 5,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
Of course the first amendment applies to new forms of speech and expression, just as evolved methods of torture implicate the eighth amendment and electronic surveillance triggers the fourth amendment. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
The issues as defined by the FCA were as follows:[10] I have regrouped the issues raised by Access under the following headings: A. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
The issues as defined by the FCA were as follows:[10] I have regrouped the issues raised by Access under the following headings: A. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
The Court welcomes written comments about the proposed amendments. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
Another lawsuit has been filed in federal court against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) looking to block implementation of the new claims and continuation rules that are to go into effect on November 1, 2007 (Final Rules; 72 Federal Register 161 at 46716). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:17 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Chapters 10 to 13 explain matters related to invalidity, including novelty, inventive step and insufficiency. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am by Diane Tweedlie
The subject-matter of independent claims 1 and 7 of auxiliary request II was obvious in particular in view of the combination of A3 and A9.X. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am by Diane Tweedlie
The subject-matter of independent claims 1 and 7 of auxiliary request II was obvious in particular in view of the combination of A3 and A9.X. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm by Sheppard Mullin
” Paragraph (h) of the proposed rule requires flow down to subcontracts, but the flow down is not limited to subcontracts the subject matter of which is export controlled. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although the Final Rules abandoned most of the headline prohibitions in the SEC’s original proposal (the “Proposed Rules”) from February 10, 2022 (discussed in our Alert Memo here) —which created shock waves through the industry for its proscriptive requirements and tone — the Final Rules still contain onerous and market practice-changing requirements. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, Judge Casey explained that [1] because OATH, as an autonomous agency and independent tribunal, its records are not under the control of Department of Correction and [2] the correction officer failed to overcome the broad presumption under the First Amendment in favor of public access to OATH proceedings.The ALJ's ruling cites Matter of Victor v New York City Off. of Trials & Hearings, 174 AD3d 455, in which the Appellate Division held that… [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, Judge Casey explained that [1] because OATH, as an autonomous agency and independent tribunal, its records are not under the control of Department of Correction and [2] the correction officer failed to overcome the broad presumption under the First Amendment in favor of public access to OATH proceedings.The ALJ's ruling cites Matter of Victor v New York City Off. of Trials & Hearings, 174 AD3d 455, in which the Appellate Division held that… [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
R. 27-10(b)) the September 1 decision that provisionally sealed the briefs until the merits panel is assigned. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 7:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Access to Justice Act, which included amendments to the Law Society Act, received Royal Assent on May 1, 2007. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:44 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently amended Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2135, which deals with the length of briefs filed with the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:09 am by Andrew Sather
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently amended Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2135, which deals with the length of briefs filed with the court. [read post]