Search for: "Interest of L.J."
Results 561 - 580
of 876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
: Why the Tax Anti-Injunction Act Permits the Present Challenges to the Minimum Coverage Provision, 121 Yale L.J. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
L.J. 225-257(2011). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
L.J., 11-109, a one-time relist in which Maryland sought relief from a twenty-two-year-old consent decree that governs substantial aspects of the state’s foster care system. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
L.J. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
L.J. 1163-1183 (2011).Forty-First Annual Administrative Law Issue. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
This means that legal realists become very interested when a court introduces a statement of the rule with the statement: "We hold that . . . [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
L.J. 635 (Winter 2011) F. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
L.J. 635 (Winter 2011) F. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
L.J. 609 (Winter 2010) Natallia Krauchuk, ARTICLE: Estate of Pew v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
L.J. 609 (Winter 2010) Natallia Krauchuk, ARTICLE: Estate of Pew v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Beck & Azari, “FDA, Off-Label Use, and Informed Consent: Debunking Myths and Misconceptions," 53 Food & Drug L.J. 71 (1998) (available here).Here on the blog, we addressed this topic back in 2007, critiquing an article that advocated informed consent suits against doctors for not discussing the non-FDA-approved status of off-label use, essentially as a means of indirectly punishing drug companies for allegedly promoting such uses too effectively. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
First Court of Appeals in Houston hands down lengthy opinion in interlocutory appeal of complex dispute over who should hear and resolve subsidiary issue in a pending arbitration proceeding. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
This is NOT about lawyers protecting their own interests. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
L.J., Father, who had primary custody of Child, requested to move Washington state with the Child because he was marrying a Washington state resident. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Other regulatory materials can be located via the briefs or law review articles already discussed.Fifth, and finally, if anyone’s interested in our First Amendment musings, they are compiled here.So you have are the resources, as best as we can supply them. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
COLLOQUY: The Public's Interest in Public Affairs Discourse, Democratic Governance, and Fairness in Broadcasting: A Critical Review of the Public Interest Duties of the Electronic Media. 82 Geo. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
L.J. 933, 938 (2000). [read post]
