Search for: "Jacobson v. Jacobson"
Results 561 - 580
of 861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 7:05 am
Jacobson Products Co., the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:49 am
” The case is Green v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:11 am
The Supreme Court has rejected those challenges, particularly in Jacobson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
On appeal, the Circuit Court found that the District Court’s decision was inconsistent with a Supreme Court Judgement in Qualitex Co. v Jacobson Products Co. 514 U.S. 159, 162 (1995) and that the previous court was incorrect because Louboutin’s red soles have the requisite "distinctiveness" to merit trade mark protection. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
On appeal, the Circuit Court found that the District Court’s decision was inconsistent with a Supreme Court Judgement in Qualitex Co. v Jacobson Products Co. 514 U.S. 159, 162 (1995) and that the previous court was incorrect because Louboutin’s red soles have the requisite "distinctiveness" to merit trade mark protection. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159, 162, 115 S. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
First, the Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Jacobson Prods. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:49 am
Jacobson (1999). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
Such a decision was at odds with the Supreme Court's decision in Qualitex v Jacobson (1995) which held that a single color can be a valid trade mark "where the color has attained 'secondary meaning' and therefore identifies and distinguishes a particular brand (and thus indicates its 'source')". [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
Supp. 2d 445, 451, 457 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Jacobson Products Co., and so the lower court erred by resting its denial of Louboutin's preliminary injunction motion on that ground, the Second Circuit said. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
Jacobson Prods. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
” Aiello v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:40 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Land Use Opinions Body: AC32877 - Jacobson v. [read post]
