Search for: "January 7, 2013 - January 24, 2013" Results 561 - 580 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Once OAL files the Final Text with the Secretary of State (likely, the next few days), any CEQA documents not circulated for the statutory public review and comment period prior to January 1, 2019 must comply with the new content requirements. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
On 7 January 2016, the Norges Bank has decided to exclude the Chinese company ZTE Corporation, one of the world’s five largest producers of telecommunications equipment and network solutions, from the investment universe of the GPFG. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am by Juan C. AntĂșnez
January 07, 2014) We all know that Florida’s homestead laws are asset-protection nirvana. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:54 am by Lonnie Roach
September 24, 2013- The Department of Labor published rules affecting Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
On 28 May 2013 a Chamber of the Fifth Section, composed of Mark Villiger, President, Angelika Nußberger, Boštjan M. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Judge Davidson conducted an arbitration trial on May 7 and June 5, 2014. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
If capital losses are more than capital gains, taxpayers can deduct the difference on their tax return to offset up to $3,000 of taxable income per year, or $1,500 if married filing separately.[5] If the total amount of the net capital loss is greater than the limit, it can be carried over to the next year’s tax return.[6] Owner-occupied Housing Exclusion Currently, the tax code provides an exemption for capital gains associated with the sale of owner-occupied homes.[7] Single filers… [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:00 am by David Pocklington
On that basis, for example, eucharistic vestments were legalised for the first time since the Reformation, despite some stern Protestant resistance.[7] The nature of communion bread had also been fiercely contested since the Reformation. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:24 pm by Mandelman
  How about this… we let them off the hook for their irresponsible homeownership, but instead we all totally snub them until 2013. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
In 2013 the Federal Court of Appeal arguably reversed its course in earlier cases where high Promises had been found. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 2:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
By the end of the depreciation period, the business would have deducted the initial dollar cost of the asset.[6] However, in most cases, depreciation schedules do not consider the time value of money (a normal return plus inflation).[7] Depreciation schedules can be based on different methods, with straight-line depreciation and declining-balance depreciation the most common. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:53 am by Kyle Hulehan
The oldest, or first-in, unit of inventory, bought at the beginning of January that year, cost $200. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
However, free advertising for what is effectively a paltry 4 to 7 percent discount leads many larger businesses to lobby for the holidays. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
If a compleat supremacy some where is not necessary in every Society, a controuling power at least is so, by which the general authority may be defended against encroachments of the subordinate authorities.Without a sweeping national veto, even in matters of seemingly local concern, states would be able to “oppress the weaker party within their respective jurisdictions,” he concluded.[7] The Constitution, too weak, had fallen short. [read post]