Search for: "Jones v. Grant" Results 561 - 580 of 2,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Jones, which holds that the president is subject to civil lawsuits (thereby allowing Paula Jones to proceed with her sexual harassment case against then-President Bill Clinton). [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
As predicted, the Supreme Court agreed with the solicitor general’s recommendation and granted review in Hernandez v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
In this Court, the Newspaper again asserts that the trial court should have granted summary judgment because the articles at issue were substantially true. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
And that is to say nothing of the grant in Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm by Caroline Lee
Jones sets up the question, but neither Jones nor the relevant history provides much in the way of answers.17 The Court subsequently applied Jones in Florida v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
The U.S. government has detained Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi under the authority Congress granted the president to combat terrorism under the Authorization for the Use of Military Force. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Zoutman v Graham 2019 ONSC 2834, the Ontario Superior Court granted summary judgment for general and aggravated damages in the sum of $50,000 to a doctor defamed on a website known as RateMDs.com. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Patja Howell shared the latest installment of the Culper Partners Rule of Law Series on the Lawfare Podcast, in which Nate Jones and David Kris spoke with former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick: Fogel shared a petition for rehearing en banc from the appellant in McKeever v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
When government lawyers dug in to the cases, they had a distinctly different impression than upon first view, and in both cases told the court to grant the petition, vacate the judgment below and remand. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
“I am using this as an argument saying that they should not maybe be as strict when deciding whether there is priority and be more lenient” and grant priority “if there is a good reasoning for granting priority. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:44 am by Schachtman
Litig., 858 F.3d 787 (3d Cir. 2017) (affirming MDL trial court’s Rule 702 exclusions of opinions that Zoloft is teratogenic); (5) Jones v. [read post]