Search for: "Kevin B. Even" Results 561 - 580 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 4:31 pm by Francis Pileggi
For a helpful commentary on the RCO doctrine generally, refer to Kevin LaCroix discussion on his blog, The D & O Diary. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 8:16 am by Peter Hirtle
Finally, the director of the museum, Kevin Glover, had to send Pearse-Hocker a letter acknowledging her generosity in donating the photos to the museum. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 6:12 am by Josh Sturtevant
For non-hockey fans, this was Boston Bruins goalie Tim Thomas's refusal to go the White House for the traditional champions meet and greet after the B's won the Stanley Cup last season. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:43 am by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller My friend Dapo Akande takes me to task today at EJIL: Talk! [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
That asymmetry follows ineluctably from Article 53(3)(b), which provides the following (emphasis mine): In addition, the Pre-Trial Chamber may, on its own initiative, review a decision of the Prosecutor not to proceed if it is based solely on paragraph 1 (c) or 2 (c). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
Thus, “because of the same-conduct requirement, [states] cannot charge crimes—including serious ones—that involve conduct the ICC is not investigating, even if prosecuting different conduct would be far more likely to result in a conviction. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:14 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  (In fact, that is true even if the use of the explosive device would qualify as a war crime.) [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm by Lara
WVU says F* You to Kevin Ford. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Ct. 2567 (2011)  Here’s what it looks like when Congress wants to “pre-empt” state law tort claims: Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the provisions of this title and title IV shall supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan described in section 4(a) and not exempt under section 4(b). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
Even if there were evidence that the allegations were true, the conduct of the Defendant could still not even arguably be brought within any of the defences recognised by the PHA. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
Manulife Financial Corporation, (2011 ONSC 1785, ¶ 3 (2011)),  the Ontario Superior Court approved a third party funding arrangement between the plaintiffs and Claims Funding International (“CFI”), an Irish corporation.[7] In arriving at his decision Justice Strathy commented on how the “loser pays” system, which is currently the typical method of assigning the costs of the litigation in Ontario, disincentivizes a class representative from coming forward:… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Daniel Shaviro
But that makes testing for empirical relationships even harder. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
.: This is the final commentary on Kevin Heller's book,The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:08 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  The Hostage tribunal, for example, refused to hold that killing hostages was per se criminal, even though Article II(1)(b) specifically deemed the “killing of hostages” a war crime (p. 216) – a reading that narrowed Law No. 10. [read post]