Search for: "L. A. Miller" Results 561 - 580 of 2,616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Wodehouse Zachary Kramer zachary_kramer Arizona State       Kris Mayes krismayes Arizona State       Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Race & the Law Land Use  Steve  Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property  Land Use   Brian Gallini profcoachg Arkansas-Fayetteville Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Legal Education Stacy Leeds stacyleeds Arkansas-Fayetteville Property American Indian Law Legal Education Jill Lens… [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Could do this directly or through expanded fair use—nature of the work could accommodate this.Joe Miller: Reconceptualize Harper & Row through this lens. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Larocque Trial In December of that same year, the new Ontario Justice Kerwin travelled to L’Orignal, Ontario, where he presided over a murder trial. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
"[A]ctual penetration need not be shown * * * before [this part of the Miller test] is satisfied. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 3:25 pm by Ezra Rosser
Miller, Sovereign Resilience: Reviving Private Sector Economic Institutions in Indian Country, forthcoming BYU L. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
The first travel ban was drafted by Trump policy aides Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller; Bannon has since been exiled from the White House, but news reports have identified Miller as the engineer of family separations, if not the drafter of the actual order. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Winnebago County, where it rejected a constitutional lawsuit brought by a young child abuse victim whom the state had placed in the custody of a violent father, “[l]ike its counterpart in the Fifth Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to . [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
  Justice Gorsuch's separate opinion, however, is in all practical respects even more protective of Fourth Amendment rights than the Chief Justice's (or it would be, anyway, if Gorsuch applies his rationale in future cases).The first 11 pages or so of Justice Gorsuch's opinion effectively convey the confusion and frustration most newcomers sense when they first confront the Miller/Smith third-party doctrine and Katz's "reasonable expectation of… [read post]