Search for: "Lilly v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2012, 11:41 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
In many circumstances, she had to make a decision because the law required it but it was not necessarily the best thing for the family.Inevitably there was some discussion about the implications of Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Summary of… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
In Lillie & Reed v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600, following a 6 month trial, he found two nursery workers, Dawn Reed and Christopher Lillie had been libelled in a Report commissioned by the Council which accused them of wide-scale sexual abuse of pre-school children. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:18 am
Id. at **6-7 (quoting Lilly v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:26 am
The United States Supreme Court recent decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
“Fraud on the market” isn’t a state-law claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Eli Lilly and Company - employment issues, more coming Marietta Squibb v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:09 am
First, as we have previously stated on this Blog, if the Supreme Court were to rule in Christopher v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Similarly, Justice de Montigny considered the file history in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
In 1996, she wrote the decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:30 am
" Bonito Boats v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 2:57 am
” In its recent judgment of 2 October 2017 (Eli Lilly v. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In Jolly v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Germany v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2010 WL 3489366, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
