Search for: "Long v. Clark"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
Clark, 2014-Ohio-2664 (10th Dist.) [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Vehicle Intelligence and Safety as well as Cloud Satchel also raise Section 101 challenges, but those cases are battling long odds. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
In Clark v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
An employee who tested positive for alcohol after fracturing her ankle on the job had her ADA claim tossed on summary judgment after a federal district court in Mississippi concluded that she could not show her injury substantially limited a major life activity or that her termination under the employer’s zero-tolerance policy was pretextual (Clark v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
Widespread voting discrimination doesn’t only exist; it has flourished since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:09 pm
Code §4.003(a)(8); See Williams v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Clark v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:07 am
Clark. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
Palmer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court case Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
Robin Frazer Clark pursues justice f [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 am
The Supreme Court has recently handed down judgment in the case of JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov, which is part of the long-running litigation between the two parties in which the claimant Bank has had judgment entered against Mr Ablyazov for an aggregate sum of $4.4 billion. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
” His Lordship’s approach to construction was premised in part on Lord Clarke JSC’s summary of the relevant principles in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, paras 14-30. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
Juvenile adjudications will never have long term consequences provided that the juvenile does not re-offend. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
It is neither too long nor too short, and neither excessively formal nor informal. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
(I need to preface this post with a caveat: It is very long because it addresses difficult issues involved in deciding when a Public Records Act applies to a state employee's use of his/her cell phone to conduct official business. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
The long-awaited judgments in the cases of Mrs Sharland and Mrs Gohil (Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61) were delivered by the Supreme Court on 14 October 2015. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm
There is also a proposal for a national minimum room size standard – at least for HMOs – in part in response to Clark v Manchester City Council (2015) UKUT 0129 (LC) More prosaically, some of you may have noticed a problem with our email updates of late. [read post]
